[stubtest] ignore __conditional_annotations__#20392
Merged
JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom Dec 10, 2025
Merged
[stubtest] ignore __conditional_annotations__#20392JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
__conditional_annotations__#20392JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
|
I'm getting a |
Contributor
Author
|
1.19.1 indeed doesn't this: https://github.com/python/mypy/commits/v1.19.1/
You could annotate it, or put it in an allowlist. |
|
Any workaround until the next release? |
Contributor
Author
|
Like I said, you could annotate it, or put it in an allowlist. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On Python 3.14, this module attribute seems to exist in certain situations:
It's a pretty esoteric attribute without any documentation. It seems to have been added in python/cpython#130935
Either way, stubtest was complaining about it in scipy-stubs. So all things considered, I figured it'd be best to just ignore it.